Asus ZenFone 5 ZE620KL vs Samsung Galaxy S9
I know that this camera comparison is a bit odd considering that Samsung Galaxy S9+ costs more than twice the price of Asus ZenFone 5. And I’m coque iphone 5s manette nes sure almost all coque iphone 5s à la mode of you are already expecting the coque iphone 7 alcool former to easily beat the latter in this department and in others.
So why did I do it coque iphone coque silicone iphone xs avant et arriere rct Well, I just wanted to check if the difference in image quality indoors is as wide as their price difference in stores.
Why a shoot out with indoor lighting Why not! More coque iphone 4s alu than 50% of the photos in my daily coque iphone 6s silicone paysage smartphone were shot indoors. I think it makes coque iphone xr star wars sense to do a camera comparison specifically in this setting because it’s the one where coque iphone xs plastique dur we almost always find coque en silicone pour iphone xs max ourselves in.
Samsung Galaxy S9+ Rear Camera Overview
The Korean Giant’s 2018 flagship phablet features a Dual Rear Camera module. This set up has a 12 MegaPixel primary shooter with variable f/1.5 2.4 aperture, 26mm coque iphone 6 riche focal length, 1/2.55″ sensor size, 1.4m pixel size, and Dual Pixel Phase Detection Autofocus. The seconday cam is also a coque transparant iphone xs 12 MegaPixel camera but it has an f/2.4 aperture, 52mm focal length, 1/3.6″ sensor size, 1m size, and AutoFocus. The module also benefits from Optical Image Stabilization.
Asus ZenFone 5 Rear Camera Overview
ZenFone coque iphone bouteille de parfum chanel 5 2018 also has a Dual Cameras at the back with phase detection autofocus. One is a 12 MegaPixel primary shooter with f/1.8 aperture, 24 mm focal length, 1/2.55″ sensor, and 1.4 m pixel size. The secondary snapper has 8 MegaPixel resolution, f/2.0 aperture, wide angle 12 mm focal length, smaller 1/4″ sensor, and smaller 1.12 m pixel size.
Alright! Let’s jump straight to the photo comparisons. The coque iphone 6 monaco first photo in each set was taken joli coque iphone 5 using the Asus ZenFone 5 while the second was snapped using the coque iphone 6 s original Samsung Galaxy S9+ all with automatic settings. No post processing including cropping was done on all of the photos in this shoot out.
With indoor lighting, coque iphone xs avec verre trempe photos taken using the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (which costs at least PHP 52,990) tend to coque iphone xs max fine transparente look brighter, warmer, and more punchy than those taken coque iphone xs or using the Asus ZenFone 5 (which sells for PHP 19,995). However, when used in settings where there’s ample ambient light, the two phones are more or less even in terms of capturing textures, details, and coque iphone 5s et 6 best friend color information, which is essential in post processing. Overall, coque iphone 6 nissan gtr straight of the camera, SGS9+ shots look better overall but with post la plus belle coque iphone 5 processing, AZF5 photos won’t be too far behind.
There you have it! Those are my thoughts and opinions about this camera shoot out, TP Friends! Let me know yours via our coque iphone 5 s miroir comments section below. Feel free to also message me on social media if you have questions or clarifications about coque iphone 6 s fnac this comparison. Cheers!..